Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3772 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 152/2021
Lavi Kumawat W/o Shri Mahendra Kumawat, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Dholi Mandi, Chomu, District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Govt.
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur City, Jaipur.
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana (West),
Jaipur.
5. Jaynarayan S/o Not Known, R/o Plot No. 114, Taranagar,
Khirni Phatak, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
6. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human
Trafficking, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta
Ms. Sushma Verma
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rekha Madnani, AGA
Mr. Namo Narayan Sharma
Mr. S.K. Gupta with
Ms. Surabhi Agarwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Judgment
16/08/2021
The instant habeas corpus petition has been filed by the
petitioner Smt. Lavi Kumawat, alleging that her minor son Master
'A' has been illegaly confined by her father Shri Mahendra and she
seeks production of the child in these proceedings.
(2 of 2) [HC-152/2021]
Learned counsel Shri S.K. Gupta has kept respondent No.7
Shri Mahendra available in the Court today with the child. We tried
to find out a resolution in the best interest of the child After
thorough consultation with the parties and observing the actions
of the child, we are of the view that the appropriate remedy for
the petitioner would be to seek custody/guardianship of the child
by approaching the Family Court concerned. In the meantime and
as an interim arrangement, it is hereby directed that the petitioner
shall be granted visitation rights to meet the child in the following
manner. Subject to all other things being in order, the petitioner
shall convey a message to the respondent Shri Mahendra who
shall keep the child available at the Tritan Mall, Jaipur on every
Sunday of the month, between 1.00 PM to 5.00 PM, where the
petitioner shall meet and interact with the child in a congenial
atmosphere.
With the expectation that the spouses would try to amicably
resolve their differences during the course of the visitation
meetings, we dispose of this habeas corpus petition without
prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to seek custody of the
child before the appropriate forum. Rule is discharged.
(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
64/-Devesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!