Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6040 AP
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2022
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26203 OF 2022
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
".....to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus
a) declaring the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in not sanctioning Ex-gratia to the petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.25 Finance (HR.1-Plg & Policy) Dept dated 18.02.2019 of the 2nd respondent, despite of making repeated representations by enclosing relevant documents as well as representation through President of the Contract Workers Union requesting for sanction of Ex-gratia to the petitioners as legal heirs to the deceased contract employees is as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to orders issued by the 2nd respondent in G.O.Ms.No.25 Finance (HR.1-Plg & Policy) Dept., dated 18.02.2019.
b) and consequently to direct the respondents to forthwith take necessary steps for sanction of Ex-gratia to the petitioners herein (who are legal heirs to deceased contract employees) in terms of G.O.Ms.No.25 Finance (HR.1-Plg & Policy) Dept., dated 18.02.2019 of the 2nd respondent and pass such other orders...."
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the
petitioners requested this Court to issue a direction to the
respondents to dispose of the representations dated 22.02.2022,
02.06.2021, 29.01.2021, 12.09.2021, 18.03.2021 and 04.03.2021
submitted by the petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 25, Finance
(HR.1-Plg & Policy) Department, dated 18.02.2019, without
touching the merits of the case.
3. Mr. K. Sreedhar Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for the
respondents/ Municipality and learned Government Pleader for
Services-IV readily agreed to dispose of the representations dated
22.02.2022, 02.06.2021, 29.01.2021, 12.09.2021, 18.03.2021 and
04.03.2021 submitted by the petitioners, if any pending with the
respondent authorities.
4. In view of the submission of learned counsel appearing for
respondents, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition.
5. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in
view of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of
India v. P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such
orders may be passed for a quick or easy disposal of cases in
overburdened adjudicatory institutions but, they do not serve to
the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners
himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the
representations dated 22.02.2022, 02.06.2021, 29.01.2021,
2019 (8) SCALE 544
12.09.2021, 18.03.2021 and 04.03.2021 submitted by the
petitioners, I find no other alternative except to issue such
direction.
6. In the result, Writ Petition is disposed of, with the consent of
both the counsel, while directing the directing the respondents to
dispose of representations dated 22.02.2022, 02.06.2021,
29.01.2021, 12.09.2021, 18.03.2021 and 04.03.2021 submitted by
the petitioners in petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.25, Finance
(HR.1-Plg & Policy) Department, dated 18.02.2019, within four (04)
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
also stand closed.
___________________________ DR.K. MANMADHA RAO, J
Date: 05.09.2022
KK
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26203 OF 2022
Date: 05.09.2022
KK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!