Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8835 AP
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2022
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.880 of 2022
ORDER:
The petitioner has approached this Court with the complaint that
the complaint filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent has not
been registered and the contention of the 1st respondent that the said
complaint was not received by him at all, is incorrect.
2. The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 st
respondent to register the said complaint and take action thereupon.
3. This Court in its judgment dated 30.07.2022 in W.P.No.8384
of 2020 held that a writ petition seeking such a direction is not
maintainable.
4. In view of the said judgment, this writ petition is disposed
of, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail of his remedies in accordance
with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
17th November, 2022 Js.
Issue C.C. by Monday.
2 RRR,J
W.P.No.880 of 2022
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.880 of 2022
17th November, 2022 Js.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!