Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Rangaiah vs M.Dhanapal
2022 Latest Caselaw 2424 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2424 AP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
M.Rangaiah vs M.Dhanapal on 6 May, 2022
Bench: B S Bhanumathi
                           HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH


MAIN CASE NO:       S.A.No.207 of 2022
                                 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.N      Date                              ORDER                            OFFICE
 o.                                                                           NOTE




       06.05.2022 BSB, J

                      Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
                      The suit is filed for permanent injunction
                  and for mandatory injunction. The trial Court
                  decreed the suit for both reliefs. The aggrieved
                  defendants preferred appeal and the same was
                  allowed setting aside the decree and judgment
                  in the suit.
                      Having aggrieved by the same, the second
                  appeal is preferred on the following substantial
                  questions of law.
                     b) Whether the First Appellate Court being Final
                     Court of facts exercised its power properly in
                     evaluating the Facts

, Depositions and Exhibits, passed Reasoned Order on facts and Issue (s) as per the Judgment of Apex Court in (2017) 15 SCC 309?

d) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction to remove the constructions in the Plaint Schedule Property?

e) Whether the Decree and Judgment of First Appellate Court are not liable to be set-aside on the ground of misreading the evidence?

f) Whether the First Appellate Court framed appropriate point for consideration or issues to be adjudicated the lis as per the pleadings and evidences on record?

g) Whether the findings, Judgment and Decree of the First Appellate Court are by misreading oral and documentary evidence on record is perverse, warranting interference of this Hon'ble Court under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure?

In view thereof, it is a fit case to admit the appeal.

ADMIT.

Notice to respondents.

Post on 05.07.2022.

Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to take out personal service of notice to the respondents through RPAD and file proof thereof.

_________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J PNV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter