Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3207 AP
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.4540 of 2011
JUDGMENT:-
No representation from the side of the petitioners.
On 23.06.2022 also, there was no representation from either
side.
Sri Ambati Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the
respondents is present.
He represents that the petition was already withdrawn by the
1st petitioner and was dismissed as such by order dated
08.08.2017.
He further submits that the 2nd petitioner wrote a letter to
his counsel to withdraw the petition, a copy of which was
submitted to the corporation/respondents.
The 3rd petitioner has already retired from service.
Be that as it may, as the matter pertains to the year 2011
and the learned counsel for the petitioners is not present, inspite of
listing the matter under the caption 'for dismissal', this petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,
shall also stand closed.
__________________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Date: 30.06.2022 SCS
11BbBBBBbB/BBB
474466446544455554646
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.4540 of 2011
Date: 30.06.2022
Scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!