Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 432 AP
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.300 of 2022
ORDER:-
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") is filed seeking
quash of proceedings in D.V.C.No.7 of 2021 on the file of the
learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class - cum - III
Additional Junior Civil judge, Eluru, West Godavari District.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the 1st respondent/State.
The petitioners are respondents 1 to 4 in D.V.C.No.7 of 2021
on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class
- cum - III Additional Junior Civil judge, Eluru.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that a
divorce petition was filed by the complainant herein on the
grounds of cruelty and the said divorce petition was dismissed and
the grounds of cruelty urged by her are not proved in the said case.
Thereafter, she has filed the present D.V.C case on the same
allegations of cruelty. Therefore, he would submit that the present
proceedings amount to abuse of process of Court and thereby
sought for quash of the said proceedings. In support of his
contention, learned counsel for the petitioners relied on the
judgment of this Court in the case of Giduthuri Kesari Kumar V.
State of Telangana1.
A perusal of the aforesaid judgment shows that this Court
has clearly held that petition to quash under Section 482 Cr.P.C of
the D.V.C proceedings is maintainable only when domestic
relationship is not existing as contemplated under Section 2(f) of
2015 (2) ALD (Crl.) 470
the D.V.C Act between the parties and when the petitioners are
acquitted in a case filed against them under Section 498A IPC on
identical grounds.
In the instant case, admittedly it is not the case of the
petitioners that they have been acquitted in a case under Section
498A IPC said to have been launched by the complainant. It is
only on the sole ground that her divorce petition was dismissed
and that alleged cruelty urged by her is not proved, this petition for
quash is filed. So, the petitioners cannot seek quash of the said
D.V.C proceedings by relying on the ratio laid down in the above
judgment. The facts of the said case are distinguishable. As per the
facts of the reported judgment, that was a case where the
petitioners therein were acquitted of the charge under Section
498A IPC. Therefore, it is held that quash petition is maintainable.
So, the said judgment is not applicable to the present facts of the
case. The other issues raised in this Criminal Petition pertain to
disputed question of facts, which require evidence and
appreciation of the same. So, the trial Court has to adjudicate the
same in the final adjudication of the said D.V.C case. At this stage,
this Court does not see any valid legal ground emanating from the
record warranting its interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C to
quash the said D.V.C proceedings as sought for by the petitioner.
So, the Criminal Petition is devoid of merit.
Resultantly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal
Petition, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Date: 28.01.2022 AKN
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.300 of 2022
Date: 28-01-2022 AKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!