Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Kamalanabha Reddy vs The District Educational ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 9550 AP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9550 AP
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
N.Kamalanabha Reddy vs The District Educational ... on 12 December, 2022
Bench: Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

                  WRIT PETITION No. 15020 of 2020

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government

Pleader for Services appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner is presently working as Second Grade Teacher in

M.P.P. School, Avalakandriga, Gangadhara Nellore Mandal, Chittoor

District. It appears that earlier, the petitioner has relinquished his right

of promotion. Subsequently, the respondents conducted counselling as

per seniority, but the petitioner was not given a chance to participate in

the counselling on the ground that he relinquished the promotion.

Therefore, the petitioner requested the 1st respondent to promote him to

the post of L.G.L. Head Master. But, the 1st respondent did not consider

his request. Then, the petitioner filed O.A.No.566 of 2019 before the

A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. The Tribunal passed

interim orders on 22.04.2019 directing the respondents to consider his

case for promotion as and when promotions are taken up to the post of

L.F.L. Head Master taking his seniority in the cadre of Second Grade

Teacher without reference of his earlier relinquishments and shall pass

appropriate orders. After service of the said orders, by an order dated

20.04.2020 the respondents rejected the request of the petitioner stating

that it is not feasible to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion.

NV,J W.P.No.15020 of 2020

3. So, the short question that is involved in this writ petition is,

whether the relinquishment of right of promotion on an earlier occasion

disentitles the petitioner from being considered for promotion on the

subsequent occasion or not?

4. The legal position in this regard is not res integra and the same

has been decided by a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in

G. Boyanna Vs. Registrar (Administration)1, wherein it is held at

paragraph No.24 as follows:

"In the light of the above discussion, we have no hesitation in holding that relinquishment of right or privilege of promotion to a particular vacancy would amount to permanent relinquishment of right of privilege for promotion to that particular vacancy. The Rule-28 of the State and Subordinate Service Rules cannot be read or interpreted to mean that his right to be considered for promotion to any vacancy arising in future also is permanently extinguished. Such an interpretation would lead to frustration and unrest in the service defeating the object of promoting efficiency and harmonious functioning....."

It is further held as follows:

"The learned Division Bench earlier expressed its complete agreement with the above interpretation of the Rule and pointing out the fact that the right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right under Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India, it was held that Rule 28 of the Rules of 1996 did not disentitle a member of a service from being considered for promotion in a future vacancy merely because he had relinquished his right for promotion earlier."

(2009) 2 ALD 402 (DB)

NV,J W.P.No.15020 of 2020

5. In the light of the law enunciated in the above judgment of the

Division Bench of this Court, the legal position is very clear that the

mere fact that the petitioner herein has earlier relinquished his right of

promotion cannot be a valid ground to disentitle him to be considered

for promotion in future vacancy, subsequently.

6. In view of the above law, the Writ Petition is allowed. The

respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for

promotion to the post of L.F.L. Head Master without reference to the

earlier relinquishment for promotion in terms of his eligibility and

qualification, as and when a suitable vacancy arises. No order as to

costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the

writ petition shall stand closed.

____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 12th December, 2022 cbs

NV,J W.P.No.15020 of 2020

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

Writ Petition No. 15020 of 2020

12th December, 2022 cbs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter