Expand

Home / Bare Acts / Central Acts and Rules / Political and Election Laws

Political and Election Laws

Bare Acts

Census Act,1948

Census Rules,1990

Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules,1961

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act,1991

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Rules,1993

Leaders and Chief Whips of Recognised Parties and Groups in Parliament (Facilities) Amendment Act, 2000
Leaders And Chief Whips Of Recognized Parties And Groups In Parliament (Facilities) Act, 1998

Leaders And Chief Whips Of Recognised Parties And Groups In Parliament (Telephone And Secretarial Facilities) Rules, 1999

Representation of the People Act,1950

Representation of the People Act,1951

State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act,2005

State Emblem Of India (Regulation Of Use) Rules, 2007

Bare Acts with Rules, Regulations & Amendments

Facebook Comments

COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA .

A. Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 8A Environmental Clearance - Environmental clearance cannot have retrospective effect - It is operational from the date it is granted. B. Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 8A Environmental Clearance - Notwithstanding terminology employed in environmental clearance - Permission was granted to SMPL to extract mineral iron ore - Permission had no reference at all to sub-category or by-product called iron ore (lump) - Same must be understood as permission to extract mineral iron ore ROM. C. Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 8A Environmental Clearance - Any mining in excess of environmental clearance would be illegal.

Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.

12/11/2018 View judgement PDF

TAMIL NADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Vs. SVS EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL TRUST

Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973, Section 12 A. The request of the First Respondent for continuance of provisional affiliation for admission of students in Bachelor of Homeopathy Medicine and Surgery (BHMS) degree course for the academic year 2016-2017 was rejected by the Appellant. In a Writ Petition filed by the First Respondent assailing the said order, the High Court of Madras directed the Appellant to permit the First Respondent to participate in the counselling for admission to Homeopathic Colleges for the academic year 2017-2018. The Division Bench of the High Court of Madras upheld the said interim order. The Appeal allowed.

S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.

12/11/2018 View judgement PDF

SIVASANKAR V.K. Vs. V.K.SIVAN .

Civil Matter. Appeals filed by the unsuccessful Defendant against the concurrent findings given by the Court of Subordinate Judge, Kozikode in O.S. and the High Court of Kerala in A.S. . It is relevant to note that the other defendants have accepted the judgment of the Trial Court, which decreed the suit for partition of the suit property, granting 1/3rd share to the plaintiff, and consequently did not file any appeal against the judgment. It was only Defendant No. 3 who questioned the judgment of the Trial Court, and failed in the appeal. A review petition filed by him was also dismissed. The Appeal dismissed.

N.V. Ramana and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

PRATAP MEHTA Vs. PRATAP MEHTA

The appeals been filed against the common judgment dated 17.07.2018 of the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal and other connected LPAs. Letters Patent Appeals were filed by the appellant aggrieved by common judgment dated 06.07.2018 of learned Single Judge (State Bar Council of M.P. v. Bar Council of India & Ors.) and Writ Petition (C) (Sunil Gupta v. Bar Council of India & Ors.). Learned Single Judge vide its judgment dated 06.07.2018 disposed of the writ petitions with certain directions. The Appeals dismissed.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

RAMESH BADLANI Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Criminal Matters. Petition filed against the impugned order of the High Court which declined to grant bail to the petitioner. The Petition dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

RAMESH BADLANI Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Criminal Matters. Petition filed against the impugned order of the High Court which declined to grant bail to the petitioner. The Petition dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

MANGT.OF SRI RAMNARAYAN MILLS LTD. Vs. SEC.COIMBATORE DIST.TEXT.WORK.UNION AND ORS.

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The appeal filed against the final judgment and order dated 13.08.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the Writ Appeal and affirmed the order of the Labour Court and Single Judge. The Appeal dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

NORTH EAST K.R.T.C. Vs. SUJATHA

Workmen\'s Compensation Act, 1923, Section 30. The appeal filed against the final judgment and order dated 29.11.2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore whereby the High Court dismissed the appellant\'s appeal and confirmed the order dated 23.04.2002 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen\'s Compensation (Labour Court), Bellary (hereinafter referred to as \"the Commissioner\"). The appeal disposed of.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

2/11/2018 View judgement PDF

M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002, Section 17(1) - Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rule 8. These matters come to us from a Full Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 06.02.2018. By an order of reference dated 19.09.2017, a learned Single Judge noticed divergent opinions expressed by two different Benches of the Allahabad High Court on the question whether an application under section 17(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the \"SARFAESI Act\" or the \"Act\"), at the instance of a borrower, is maintainable even before physical or actual possession of secured assets is taken by banks/financial institutions in exercise of their powers under section 13(4) of the Act read with rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 The appeals sent back to the Court/Tribunal decide each case in accordance with the law laid down by this judgment.

R.F. Nariman and Navin Sinha, JJ

1/11/2018 View judgement PDF

KAMIL Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Indian Penal Code, Sections 34, 302 and 323 - Criminal Procedure Code, Section 464. Appeal arises out of the judgment dated 28.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal and by which the High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant thereby affirming his conviction under Section 302 IPC and for other offences and sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon him passed by the trial court. The Appeal dismissed.

R. Banumathi and Indira Banerjee, JJ.

31/10/2018 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

Political and Election Laws

Leave a Reply Cancel reply