Home / Bare Acts / Central Acts and Rules / Political and Election Laws

Political and Election Laws

Bare Acts

Bare Acts with Rules, Regulations & Amendments

Facebook Comments

M. AAMIRA FATHIMA AND ORS. Vs. ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

Annamalai University Act, 1928 - Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Collection of Capitation Fee) Act, 1992 - State Legislature vide Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Collection of Capitation Fee) Amendment Act, 2007. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 26.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No.1637 of 2014 and other connected matters. Matter arising from Writ Appeal No.1637 of 2014 which in turn arose from Writ Petition No.20720 of 2014, namely M. Aamira Fathima and others v. Annamalai University and others is taken to be the lead matter and the facts leading to the filing of the said writ appeal are set out in detail hereunder. Appeal allowed.

Arun Mishra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

13/7/2018 View judgement PDF

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR Vs. M/S GWALIOR JHANSI EXPRESSWAY LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR

Appeal emanates from the decision of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 21st August, 2017 in Appeal ARB.A (Comm.) No.20 of 2017 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, \"the Act\") seeking to quash the order dated 24th May, 2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act came to be dismissed. The Arbitral Tribunal vide order dated 24th May, 2017 allowed the application preferred by the respondent (claimant) under Section 17 of the Act seeking a direction to the appellant to allow the respondent to exercise an option to match the lowest bid in terms of the order dated 23rd July, 2016 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal and including to exercise Right of First Refusal (\"ROFR\") and for other consequential reliefs. Appeal allowed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

13/7/2018 View judgement PDF

PARAKH VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. BAROMA AGRO PRODUCT

Appeal arises out of the order dated 01.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in AOPT No.349 of 2016 affirming the order of the Single Judge in and by which it was held that the respondent-defendant is entitled to use the word \'MALABAR\' in conjunction with the mark \'BAROMA\' for selling its product - Biryani Rice. By the impugned order, the Division Bench has also affirmed the findings of the Single Judge that subject to the outcome of the suit, the respondents can pursue their application for registration of their label. Appeal dismissed.

Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ.

12/7/2018 View judgement PDF

OM PRAKASH SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR

Criminal Procedure Code, Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, Section 420, 406, 379, 448, 307, 427 and 506 read with Section 34. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.10.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52088/2013 allowing the petition filed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has set aside the order dated 10.09.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, Bihar in Siwan (M) P.S. Case No. 288/2012, taking cognizance of the offence under Section 420/406/379/448/307/427 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused-respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein. Appeal disposed of.

N.V. Ramana and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

N.N. GODFRED Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.( FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2

Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Section 30 - Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, Regulation 86. The present Civil Appeal has been filed under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 to challenge the judgment and order dated February 25, 2010 passed by the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi. Appeal allowed.

S. Abdul Nazeer and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

HETAL CHIRAG PATEL Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Appeals filed against the common final judgment and order dated 29.06.2018 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Civil Application No.3 of 2018 in F/LPA No.36 of 2018 in SCA No.11163 of 2012 & other allied matters. The Division Bench dismissed the applications filed by the appellants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeals holding inter alia that there was no sufficient cause made out by the appellants in filing the appeals which were delayed by 233 days. Appeal allowed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

MOTIRAM PADU JOSHI Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Indian Penal Code, Sections Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 30.07.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.174 of 1994 in and by which the High Court reversed the judgment of the acquittal of the appellants/accused Nos. 3, 5, 7 and 8 and convicted them under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment. Appeal dismissed.

Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ.

10/7/2018 View judgement PDF

K.K. JHA KAMAL Vs. JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Respondent-Jharkhand High Court initiated proceedings against the appellant under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and convicted him for the offence of criminal contempt and sentenced him to undergo sentence of simple imprisonment for six months. There was also a direction to the Bar Council of India to take appropriate action against the appellant. It was made clear that until the appellant purged with the contempt, he would not be entitled to practise under the jurisdiction of the respondent-High Court, except for the chamber practice. Appeal partly allowed.

Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.

10/7/2018 View judgement PDF

DR. P.V. RAMANA Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

The appellants are before us, aggrieved by the order dated 06.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.4153/2017. The appeal disposed of.

Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.

6/7/2018 View judgement PDF

LALIT YADAV Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Indian Penal Code, Section 228-A. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 376 IPC and Section 342 IPC and sentenced to substantive sentences of seven years and one year respectively. His conviction and sentence has been affirmed by the High Court by dismissing present appeal. We do not see any reason to upset the orders of conviction and sentence and as such this petition stands dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

5/7/2018 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

Latest laws Helping good people to do good things.

Tuesday

17 July 2018

After LLB Entrance Exam Fiasco, DU’s Law Faculty embroiled in New Controversy: Students allege all LLM Semester Exams leaked

TRAI: Users have primary right over their Personal Information while Entities act as mere Custodians

Lawyers thrash Rape Accused Men in High Court premises for allegedly raping 11-year-old Girl with hearing Disability for Months. Watch Video here

LatestLaws.com Partner Event: 5th VIPS International Law Moot Court Competition 2018 (Oct 12-14, Delhi): Prizes Worth ₹60K; Register by 15th Aug

All about Commencement of Proceedings under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 By Sakshi Rewaria

Validity of Foreign Judgments in India By Maahi Mayuri

Right to Strike: To What Extent? By: Lavina Bhargava

All about Process to Compel Appearance under Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By: Pinky Dass

All About Process to Compel the Production of Things under Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By Pinky Dass

All about Framing of Charges under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 By Sakshi Rewaria

Section 138, NI Act: Position of Law on Cheque Bounce and Punishment in India By: Akanksha Yadav

Political and Election Laws

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Get Latest Laws News Alert

Get Latest Laws News Alert