Saturday, 20, Apr, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984


 

 Prevention of Damage To Public Property Act, 1984 (PDF File)
 

SECTIONS

1. Short title, extent and commencement
2. Definitions
3. Mischief causing damage to public property
4. Mischief causing damage to public property by fire or explosive substance
5. Special provisions regarding bail
6. Saving
7. Repeal and saving

An Act to provide for prevention of damage to public property and for matters connected therewith .

Be it enacted by Parliament in the Thirty-fifth Year of the Republic of India as follows:

  1. Short title, extent and commencement .(1) This Act may be called The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.

(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.

(3) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the 28th day of January, 1984.

2. Definitions .In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,

(a) mischief shall have the same meaning as in section 425 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860);

(b) public property means any property, whether immovable or movable (including any machinery) which is owned by, or in the possession of, or under the control of

(i) the Central Government; or

(ii) any State Government; or

(iii) any local authority; or

(iv) any corporation established by, or under, a Central, Provincial or State Act; or

(v) any company as defined in section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); or

(vi) any institution, concern or undertaking which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf:

Provided that the Central Government shall not specify any institution, concern or undertaking under this sub-clause unless such institution, concern or undertaking is financed wholly or substantially by funds provided directly or indirectly by the Central Government or by one or more State Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments.

  1. Mischief causing damage to public property .(1) Whoever commits mischief by doing any act in respect of any public property, other than public property of the nature referred to in sub-section (2), shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine.

(2) Whoever commits mischief by doing any act in respect of any public property being

(a) any building, installation or other property used in connection with the production, distribution or supply of water, light, power or energy;

(b) any oil installations;

(c) any sewage works;

(d) any mine or factory;

(e) any means of public transportation or of tele-communications, or any building, installation or other property used in connection therewith, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months, but which may extend to five years and with fine:

Provided that the Court may, for reasons to be recorded in its judgment, award a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than six months.

  1. Mischief causing damage to public property by fire or explosive substance .Whoever commits an offence under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 3 by fire or explosive substance shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year, but which may extend to ten years and with fine:

Provided that the Court may, for special reasons to be recorded in its judgment, award a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year.

  1. Special provisions regarding bail .No person accused or convicted of an offence punishable under section 3 or section 4 shall, if in custody, be released on bail or on his own bond unless the prosecution has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release.
  2. Saving .The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the provisions of any other law for the time being in force, and nothing contained in this Act shall exempt any person from any proceeding (whether by way of investigation or otherwise) which might, apart from this Act, be instituted or taken against him.
  3. Repeal and saving .(1) The Prevention of Damage to Public Property Ordinance, 1984 (3 of 1984), is hereby repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.

 

 

 
Related News & Articles :
Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Related judgement on Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984

State of Karnataka Vs. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida Naseer @ Umarhazi @ Hazi & Ors., 2023 Latest Caselaw 853 SC Mohd. Naushad Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), 2023 Latest Caselaw 557 SC Manoj Pratap Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2022 Latest Caselaw 497 SC KANWAR PAL SINGH vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1297 SC Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, 2018 Latest Caselaw 824 SC Kodungallur Film Society & ANR. Vs. Union of India & Ors. [October 01, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 709 SC Koshy Jacob Vs. Union of India & Ors. [November 28, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 839 SC Chandra Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan [May 9, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 357 SC C.B.I. Vs. Karimullah Osan Khan [March 4, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 154 SC Advocates Association, Bangalore Vs. Union of India & Ors. [AUGUST 27, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 587 SC State of Maharashtra Vs. Fazal Rehman Abdul [March 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 219 SC Ahmed Shah Khan Durrani @ A.S. Mubarak S Vs. State of Maharashtra [March 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 218 SC Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through STF, CBI Mumbai [MARCH 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 217 SC Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan Vs. State of Maharashtra [March 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 216 SC Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. The State of Maharashtra,Through CBI , Bombay [MARCH 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 215 SC Sanjay Dutt (A-117) vs. The State of Maharashtra, through CBI (STF), Bombay [MARCH 21, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 214 SC State of Maharashtra Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors. [March 14, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 198 SC Dalco Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Satish Prabhakar Padhye & Ors [2010] INSC 238 (31 March 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 233 SC