हिंदी समाचार पढ़े
Expand
O.P. Jindal Global University
 
Home / Articles / ‘Possibility of bias or predetermined conclusion in Criminal Investigations comes to end’ by Rushab Aggarwal

‘Possibility of bias or predetermined conclusion in Criminal Investigations comes to end’ by Rushab Aggarwal

In an authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court, rendered by a bench of Three Judges, the Supreme Court hasThree AAP MLAs booked by Delhi Police answered an important question concerning prosecutions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

In Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab, speaking for the bench, Justice Navin Sinha has answered the question that‘…[w]hether in a criminal prosecution, it will be in consonance with the principles of justice, fair play and a fair investigation, if the informant and the investigating officer were to be the same person. In such a case, is it necessary for the accused to demonstrate prejudice, especially under laws such as NDPS Act, carrying a reverse burden of proof…’ to hold that a fair investigation necessarily warranted that the informant and the investigator must not be the same person.

Pronouncement was by a three-judge bench of Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice R Banumathi and Justice Navin Sinha.

In this case, the Supreme Court, analyzed the conflicting decisions of various courts and has finally settled an issue, benefit whereof will ensure to those accused persons, who have been victims of a prejudiced investigation.

It is no secret that in a majority of cases under the NDPS Act, there is often no complainant and the Investigating Officer purportedly act on source and secret informations.

The Supreme Court has clarified that if the IO is the complainant, it would reflect on the credibility of the investigation and the obligation cast on the investigator to act fairly and judiciously would not be met. The court emphasized that the prosecutions under the NDPS Act carry a reverse burden of proof and this exemplifies the solemn duty of the prosecution to act fairly.

It further goes on to say that the case of the prosecution would not be allowed to rest on a preponderance of probabilities.

Bench further observed,

 ”A fair trial to an accused, a constitutional guarantee under Article 21 of the Constitution, would be a hollow promise if the investigation in a NDPS case were not to be fair or raises serious questions about its fairness apparent on the face of the investigation. In the nature of the reverse burden of proof, the onus will lie on the prosecution to demonstrate on the face of it that the investigation was fair, judicious with no circumstances that may raise doubts about its veracity.

The obligation of proof beyond reasonable doubt will take within its ambit a fair investigation, in absence of which there can be no fair trial. If the investigation itself is unfair, to require the accused to demonstrate prejudice will be fraught with danger vesting arbitrary powers in the police which may well lead to false implication also. Investigation in such a case would then become an empty formality and a farce. Such an interpretation therefore naturally has to be avoided.”

NDPS prosecutions are often invoked wrongfully for purposes such as retribution. It remains to be seen whether the Police Departments will issue orders to the officials to make sure that the prescribed procedure of investigation is intricately followed.

Failure to do so would result in rampant acquittals. It is the need of the hour that the police force is adequately sensitized to the nuances of the special Criminal Laws.

By Rushab Aggarwal, Advocate

Read Text of the Judgement Here-

Supreme Court in Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab laid informant and Investigative Officers can not be same by Latest Laws Team on Scribd

Facebook Comments

IBN IBN

TOI

TOI Time to straighten up Time to straighten up                pic by TOI TOI

TOI

[caption id="attachment_97474" align="alignleft" width="621"]Donald Trump’s immigration ban Donald Trump’s immigration ban[/caption]

TOI

Hindu Hindu Cartoon Hindu TOI Let Justice Be Let Justice Be Hindu Hindu [caption id="attachment_97477" align="alignleft" width="621"]UIDAI Leaks UIDAI Leaks[/caption]

...as an eminent lawyer you ought to know that your action tantamount to, under Section B, sub-section G.VIX, read along with I.P.C. (A) XI (B), notwithstanding...                                        TOI

Hindu

Hindu

TOI

Demonitisation Diaries 2 Demonitisation Diaries 2  pic by sify State of Affairs Women Safety: State of Affairs             pic by mangal Demonitisation Diaries 1 Demonitisation Diaries 1                                  pic by sify   Hindu

Hindu

150425_-_farmers_a_2384764f

Hindu

Hindu Hindu

If India takes One Step, we will take Two by Satish If India takes One Step, we will take Two ...................by Satish Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally pic by OMG Alligator vs Litigator Alligator vs Litigator Missing the Point Missing the Point pic by english blog

Hindu

Acheche DIn Acheche Din     pic by sify Hindu

TOI

Hindu

Hindu

Hindu [caption id="attachment_97467" align="alignleft" width="621"]Humour with Latest Laws Humour with Latest Laws[/caption] Tax Reforms    by Hindu Tax Reforms by Hindu TOI

pinterest

Humour @ Latest Laws Achhey Din Humour @ Latest Laws: Achhey Din Pic by Hindu Women Empowerment and Sports Women Empowerment and Sports

Hindu

Four Pillars of Democracy Four Pillars of Democracy             by Satish

Hindu Hindu

Job Hazards TOI Auto Driver thrashed for no fault Auto Driver thrashed for no fault,                  source oneindia TOI

TOI

TOI

Belts are for Dogs Belts are for Dogs ALL_1_Theme_01A_24_2383617g

Hindu

TOI

America First Walk Your own Talk Demonitisation Diaries Demonitisation Diaries                                                       by sify Hindu Soaring of Oil Prices pic by indiaone

TOI

Hindu [caption id="attachment_97462" align="alignleft" width="524"]Painting India Saffron Painting India Saffron[/caption] State of Two Nations State of Two Nations               pic by sandeep Delivery Boy Delivery Boy                    by Satish

Hindu

 
 
 

Check Also

Diplomatic Means of Dispute Settlement Between States: How Different are they from Judicial Means? By: Divyansh Hanu

December 13,2018: The Author, Divyansh Hanu Rathi, is currently pursuing his Masters in Law (LLM) in International Dispute Resolution at Kings College London. Diplomatic Means of Dispute Settlement Between States By Divyansh Hanu Introduction Our society has been forever riddled ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest laws

Join our mailing list to receive the Latest Laws News and updates from our team.