Telangana High Court
The L.A.O. And R D O, Miryalaguda vs Shaik Gousia Bee, Nalgonda Dist And 19 ... on 25 July, 2024
Author: Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Bench: Abhinand Kumar Shavili
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
LAAS.No.299 of 2015
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty) Heard learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents/claimants.
2. This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short 'the Act') is filed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Miryalaguda, aggrieved by the common order and decree dated 27.04.2015 passed in respect of O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.
3. The undisputed facts of the case are that the subject lands situated in Sy.Nos.711, 712, 713, 722, 724, 668 and 687, admeasuring different extents, both dry and I.D., totalling to Acs.5.12 guntas situated in the limits of Damaracherla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, belonging to the respondents/ claimants were acquired for laying Railway line from Vishnupuram to 2 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015 Janpahad; that draft Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published in A.P. Gazette on 28.01.2009; that the Land Acquisition Officer, after conducting award enquiry, passed Award, dated 23.03.2010, granting compensation @ Rs.1,00,000/- per acre for dry lands and Rs.1,25,000/- per acre for ID lands.
4. Not being satisfied with the said Award, the respondents/ claimants sought reference under Section 18 of the Act and the same was numbered as O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.
5. Before the Reference Court, on behalf of the respondents/ claimants, P.Ws-1 to 10 were examined and Exs.A-1 and A-21 were marked. On behalf of the Referring Officer, RW-1 was examined and Ex.B-1-Award was marked.
6. It is contended by the learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellant that the Reference Court failed to note that the acquired lands are agricultural lands and as such, there is no scope for development of the same; that the Reference Court erred in relying upon the documents pertaining to small 3 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015 extents of lands while grating compensation to large extent of land as in the present case and thereby, erred in drastically enhancing the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer and as such, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
7. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/claimants, contended that the Reference Court, taking into account the oral and documentary evidence adduced before it, rightly enhanced the compensation for the acquired lands and the same needs no interference by this Court.
8. Before the Reference Court, to support their claim, respondent No.18/claimant No.18 got examined himself as P.W-1 and deposed that Damaracherla is a Mandal Head Quarter since 1985 and has civil amenities like Mandal Development Office, Banks, several educational institutions, Railway Station, etc., and it is one of the business centres in Nalgonda District; that lands similar to acquired lands were sold for commercial and non- commercial purposes and the transactions range between Rs.1,000/- to Rs.1,500/- per square yard.
4 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015
9. P.W-5 deposed that he sold land to an extent of 730 square yards in Sy.No.712 of Damaracherla Village for a consideration of Rs.700/- per square yard, vide document No.5360/2008, dated 24.11.2008.
10. P.W-7 deposed that he purchased an extent of 194 square yards of land in Sy.No.713/A of Damaracherla Village for a consideration of Rs.490/- per square yard, vide document No.2207/2006, dated 11.08.2006.
11. R.W-1-Land Acquisition Officer while reiterating the contents of the Award, admitted that the acquired lands are adjacent to Damaracherla Village; Damaracherla Village is situated on both sides of State Highway i.e., from Hyderabad to Guntur (Narkatpalli to Addanki) and Hyderabad to Narketpalli comes under National Highway and then Narketpally to Addanki is a State Highway and further leading to Chennai on National Highway; and that there are several cement factories viz., India Cement Industry, Deccan Cement Industry, Penna Cement Industry located in and around Damaracherla Village within a distance of 10 kms radius.
5 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015
12. From the evidence available on record, it can be gathered that the acquired lands are situated on either side of State Highway and also Damaracherla Village is a Mandal Head Quarter with all civic amenities, Government offices, educational institutions, etc. Further, the existence of various Cement Industries within a distance of 10 kms radius from the acquired lands also goes to show that the acquired lands have high potentiality to be converted into non-agricultural purposes i.e., for house sites, for establishing industries, etc.
13. Thus, ample evidence is on record to the effect that the acquired lands, though agricultural lands, are fit and have high potentiality to be converted as non-agricultural lands. The evidence of R.W-1 also fortifies the case of the claimants that the acquired land are situated on either side of State Highway of Narketpalli to Addanki road and are adjacent to Damaracherla Village. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Reference Court has rightly assessed the compensation for the acquired lands on yard basis.
6 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015
14. Further, it is to be noted that though the claimants have got marked as many as 21 exhibits, the extents of land covered under majority of the said exhibits are very small and hence, this Court is of the opinion that the sale consideration reflected in the said documents cannot be taken as representative sale price for assessing the market value of the acquired lands.
15. However, it is pertinent to note that Exs.A-1 to A-5 pertain to sale transactions of the years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 in respect of land in Sy.Nos.713 and 713/A of Damaracherla Village. Of all the said transactions, the land sold under Ex.A-2-sale deed is the highest in extent, being 328 ½ square yards @ Rs.490/- per square yards. Also, as regards Ex.A-3, P.W-7-vendee of the said document was examined. He deposed to the effect that he purchased land admeasuring 194 square yards in Sy.No.173/A of Damaracherla Village @ Rs.490/- per square yard.
16. In the instant case, the draft notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published on 28.01.2009. Exs.A-2 and A-3-sale transactions pertain to the year 2006 i.e., within three years preceding the date of draft notification. Therefore, it is fair and just 7 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015 to rely upon Exs.A-2 and A-3 for fixing the market value of the acquired lands and the market value mentioned in the said sale deeds can be taken as a representative sale. Thus, the Reference Court had rightly considered Ex.A-3 as an exemplar sale deed and fixed the market value of the acquired lands @ Rs.490/- per square yard.
17. However, this Court is of the considered view that the Reference Court erred in adding escalation @ 12% per annum on the market value assessed for the acquired lands since Ex.A-3 is within the period of three years from the date of issuance of 4(1) notification. The Reference Court also erred in deducting only 1/4th towards developmental charges and it ought to have deducted 33% towards developmental charges. By calculating thus, the market value of the acquired lands works out to Rs.329/- per square yard, i.e., after deducting 33% of Rs.490/-.
18. In the light of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the foregoing reasons, this Appeal is allowed in part and the order and decree dated 27.04.2015 passed in O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, is modified fixing the 8 AKS,J & LNA, J LAAS.No.299 of 2015 market value of the acquired lands @ Rs.329/- per square yard. The remaining portion of the impugned order of the Reference Court remains unaltered. No order as to costs.
19. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J ___________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Dated: 25.07.2024 dr