HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 31/2015
Manwar Ali
----Appellant
Versus
Mst Rukmani And Others
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Dr. P.C. Jain
Mr. Zeeshan Khan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Advocate
assisted by Mr. Rohan Agarwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/07/2022
An application (I.A.No.01/2021) has been filed by appellant under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC alleging inter alia that respondent No.39 Mahesh Kumar Singhania has passed away without leaving behind any legal representatives to the knowledge of appellant. Hence a prayer has been made to delete the name of deceased respondent No. 39 Mahesh Kumar Singhania from the array of cause title.
Learned counsel for respondents does not oppose the application, hence the application (I.A.No.01/2021) is allowed and the name of respondent No.39 Mahesh Kumar Singhania is allowed to be deleted. The amended cause title enclosed with the application, is allowed to be taken on record.
The second appeal is yet to be heard on admission. Respondents-decree holders have moved an application that the decree for possession has already been passed in their favour, (Downloaded on 08/07/2022 at 09:22:20 PM) (2 of 2) [CSA-31/2015] and sale deeds of the appellant have been cancelled, however, appellant has started to raise construction. Respondents made complainants before the concerned government authorities, however, no action has been taken place. Hence, a prayer has been made that appellant be restrained from raising construction and to maintain status quo of the property in question. Appellant has also moved an application seeking stay of execution of the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.11.2014.
List this appeal for admission again on 20.07.2022. In the meanwhile, parties are directed to maintain status quo of the property in question, as it exists today.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SACHIN /86 (Downloaded on 08/07/2022 at 09:22:20 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)