HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18360/2022
1. Ravi Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o M-16, Bundi Road, Ram Nagar, District Chittorgarh.
2. Om Prakash Salvi S/o Shri Ratan Lal Salvi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Near Bus Stand, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh.
3. Shankar Lal Dhakar S/o Shri Kanhiya Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Mukhy Gram Deopura, District Chittorgarh.
4. Manoj Sharma S/o Shri Mitthu Lal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Quarter No. 2, Near Inani School, Segwa Housing Board, Senthi, District Chittorgarh.
5. Paridhi Purohit S/o Shri Chandra Prakash Purohit, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 17, Rama Vihar, Ward No. 46, District Bhilwara.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.
4. The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Udaipur, District Udaipur.
5. The Principal Medical Officer (Pmo), Shri Sanwaliyaji Government General Hospital, Chittorgarh.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.S. Rajpuroit, AAG (through VC) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order 05/12/2022 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by order in Savita Manmiya v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP (Downloaded on 06/12/2022 at 12:04:06 AM) (2 of 2) [CW-18360/2022] No.2835/2020, decided on 16.02.2021. However, it is also pointed out that in DBSAW No.63/2022, on 04.02.2022, the said order has been stayed and the appeal is pending consideration before the Division Bench.
It is submitted that the petitioners were working on the post of Nursing Tutor / Nursing Tutor - cum - Clinical Instructor, have applied for issuance of experience certificate and grant of bonus marks. The experience certificate has not been issued to the petitioners, which is not justified.
A copy of the petition has been served on Mr. K.S.
Rajpurohit, AAG, who prays for time to complete his instructions in the matter.
List the petition on 09.01.2023.
In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed to issue the experience certificate in relation to the post, on which, the petitioners are performing their duties. However, the issuance of said certificate would not be taken as any endorsement by this Court regarding the eligibility of the petitioner to seek bonus marks, as the said aspect would be governed by the judgment of the Division Bench.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J 176-Rmathur/-
(Downloaded on 06/12/2022 at 12:04:06 AM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)