Kishanlal @ Krishan Kumar S/O ... vs The State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6991 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Kishanlal @ Krishan Kumar S/O ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 29 November, 2021
Bench: Farjand Ali
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13379/2021

Kishanlal @ Krishan Kumar S/o Sahiram, Aged About 52 Years,
R/o Ward No. 17 Sardarsahar Dist. Churu Raj. (At Present In Sub
Jail Fatehpur Shekhawati Sikar )
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr.Subhash Sharma
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr.Arvind Kumar, PP



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                           Judgment / Order

29/11/2021

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.93/2021 registered at Police Station Kotwali Fatehpur, Distt. Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 306 and 384 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that patently false case has been foisted against the petitioner, he has nothing to do with the alleged crime. He submits that ingredients essential to constitute an offence under Sec. 306 read with Sec. 120B IPC are conspicuously missing. Even if evidence as collected by the Agencies during the course of investigation are taken on its face value and in its entirety ; the same would not be sufficient enough to bring home the guilt of the accused. The petitioner is an innocent person, investigation has been completed and charge- (Downloaded on 01/12/2021 at 09:37:07 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-13379/2021] sheet has been submitted. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is behind the bars since long and conclusion of trial may take long time to culminate.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kishanlal @ Krishan Kumar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J SANDEEP RAWAT /23/11 (Downloaded on 01/12/2021 at 09:37:07 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)