Dhannalal vs State Of Rajasthan-State

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11858 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dhannalal vs State Of Rajasthan-State on 29 July, 2021
Bench: Sandeep Mehta, Manoj Kumar Garg

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 418/2021 Dhannalal, S/o Unkar, B/c Dholi R/o Sadas, Police Thana Baneda, Dist. Bhilwara. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Ajmer, Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan-State, Through Secretary Home Jaipur.

2. Collector, Bhilwara.

3. Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer.

                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)             :     By post
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Farzand Ali, G.A.-cum-A.A.G. with
                                    Mr. Abhishek Purohit



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

                                     Judgment

29/07/2021

Heard. Perused the material available on record. The convict Dhannalal, S/o Unkar, has been granted regular parole of forty days by the District Parole Advisory Committee, Bhilwara vide order dated 16.12.2020 whereby, he has been directed to furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties in the like amount as a pre-requisite condition for being released on parole.

The convict-petitioner has forwarded this letter petition from jail seeking relaxation in the condition of furnishing surety bonds in terms of the order of the District Parole Committee owing to his poor financial condition.

(Downloaded on 29/07/2021 at 08:59:34 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLW-418/2021] Shri Farzand Ali, learned G.A.-cum-A.A.G. has placed on record the factual report forwarded from the office of the Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara as per which, the financial as well as the social position of the petitioner's family is very weak. He has also placed on record the report of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer as per which, previously the petitioner had availed parole facilities upon furnishing bail and bonds.

Thus, having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already availed parole facilities satisfactorily, and as now, because of his family being in dire financial condition, he is unable to furnish the surety bonds despite parole being sanctioned to him in December, 2020, we deem it proper to release the petitioner Dhannalal, S/o Unkar on forty days' regular parole by relaxing the condition of furnishing two surety bonds as imposed by the District Parole Advisory Committee in its order dated 16.12.2020. Thus, the requirement of furnishing two surety bonds is waived. He shall mark his attendance at the Police Station Baneda, District Bhilwara every 7th day after his release on parole. The other conditions as imposed by the Committee qua the convict petitioner are maintained.

The writ petition is allowed, accordingly. (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 19-/Devesh/-

(Downloaded on 29/07/2021 at 08:59:34 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)