HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9583/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9585/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9587/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9589/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9590/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9592/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent (Downloaded on 30/07/2021 at 08:48:32 PM) (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9583/2021] S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9594/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9595/2021 Shanti Bai
----Petitioner Versus State
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr Harish Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Judgment / Order 29/07/2021 These cases have been listed in To Be Mentioned category as there was confusion about the exact nature of order passed on 27.07.2021 in open Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
These bail applications have been filed under Section 438 CrPC in connection with FIR Nos. 447/2014, 446/2014, 452/2014, 451/2014, 450/2014, 448/2014, 449/2014 & 445/2014 registered at ACB Chowki District Udaipur for the offences under Sections 13(1)(C)(D) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Sections 409, 120B IPC whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners moved bail applications before the court below, which were dismissed.
Hence, present bail applications have been filed.
(Downloaded on 30/07/2021 at 08:48:32 PM)(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9583/2021] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the co-
accused Sarpanch as well as Panchayat Secretary have been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court. So far as the present accused-petitioners are concerned, they are ladies. The allegation is common in all FIRs, of having issued forged pattas by the Sarpanch and the role of the petitioners is minimal.
Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, I am inclined to grant interim bail to the petitioners. The petitioners would join interrogation before the ACB Authorities on 03.08.2021 and report shall be submitted before this Court on the next date.
List these cases again on 09.08.2021, with report of the Investigating Officer.
In the meanwhile, the petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR Nos.447/2014, 446/2014, 452/2014, 451/2014, 450/2014, 448/2014, 449/2014 & 445/2014 registered at ACB Chowki District Udaipur.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J 117-124 MMA/-
(Downloaded on 30/07/2021 at 08:48:32 PM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)