Pawan Kumar Yadav vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pawan Kumar Yadav vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 July, 2021

Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8560/2021 Pawan Kumar Yadav S/o Hariram Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, R/ o V.p.o. Sirohi Tehsil Neem Ka Thana District Sikar.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum-

Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sirohi.

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar.

4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sheoganj, Distt. Sirohi.

5. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar.

6. The District Education Officer, Sirohi.

7. The District Education Officer, Sikar.

8. The Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sheoganj, Distt. Sirohi.

9. The Chief Block Elementary Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar.

10. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, Naradara, District Sirohi.

11. Panchayat Elementary Education Officer, (Bhojmed), District Sikar.

                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. SK Verma
For Respondent(s)            :



                        JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                    Judgment

26/07/2021

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the Coordinate (Downloaded on 26/07/2021 at 09:02:23 PM) (2 of 2) [CW-8560/2021] Bench decision dated 14.03.2019 rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition No.15411/2018) and in the case of Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors (SB Civil Writ Petition No.12846/2017), decided on 15.01.2018.

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the judgments rendered in the case of Ashok Kumar Sharma (supra) and Dhanraj Meena (supra) and it is directed that the respondents while dealing with the case of the petitioner pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 & 26 of the RSR as per law.

The stay application is also disposed of.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 57-CPGoyal/-

(Downloaded on 26/07/2021 at 09:02:23 PM)