Hema Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Hema Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 4 January, 2021

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13043/2020

1. Hema Ram S/o Mohan Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Near Shani Mandir, Surendra Nagar, Kuchaman City, District Nagaur (Raj.).

2. Sampati Devi W/o Hema Ram D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Near Shani Mandir, Surendra Nagar, Kuchaman City, District Nagaur (Raj.).

3. Sanju Devi W/o Parma Ram D/o Chandra Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 7 Panwari, Rooppura, Tehsil Kuchaman, District Nagaur (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

2. The Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

3. Te District Social Welfare Officer, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Nagaur (Raj.).

                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal (through VC)
For Respondent(s)          :



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order 04/01/2021 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in bunch of writ petition led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.372/2013 (Anokh Bai Vs. State of Raj. & Ors).

(Downloaded on 04/01/2021 at 08:26:07 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-13043/2020] In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a representation within two weeks along with certified copy of the order instant and a copy of the judgment in the case of Anokh Bai (supra).

On receipt of representation along with the certified copy of the order instant, respondents shall decide the same within a period of eight weeks, in accordance with law including the law laid down in Anokh Bai's case.

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 74-Sumit/-

(Downloaded on 04/01/2021 at 08:26:07 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)