Sher Singh Jakhad Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7088 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Sher Singh Jakhad Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 December, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Vyas
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

           S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence

                     Application No.1009/2021

                                       In

               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1645/2021

Sher Singh Jakhad Son Of Shri Shivpal Singh, Aged About 27
Years, Resident Of Bharni Police Station Reengus District Sikar.
At Present In Central Jail, Bikaner
                                                         ----Accused-Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP
                                                                ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dharmendar Choudhary for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS Order 01/12/2021 Heard on application for suspension of sentence. The appellant has filed the appeal along with application for suspension of sentence.

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22.09.2021 passed by the Court of Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act 2005, Sikar in Sessions Case No.229/2018, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 376, 447 of IPC and Section 3(A)/4 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to maximum term of ten years. (Downloaded on 04/12/2021 at 09:24:35 PM)

(2 of 3) It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the case. There are several material contradictions and infirmities in the prosecution evidence. The appellant has been named in the FIR but the prosecutrix in her statement admitted that she did not know him before the incident. Thus, the name of the accused-appellant in the FIR is suspicious. The appellant has been involved due to some extraneous reasons. During trial, the appellant was on bail and now, he is in custody since 22.09.2021. He has already served about more than one year of sentence. Medical evidence also does not support the prosecution case. Hearing of appeal may take long time.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the evidence available on record carefully.

Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the application for suspension of sentence.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused- appellant Sher Singh Jakhad S/o Shri Shivpal Singh shall remain suspended till disposal of this criminal appeal and he be released on bail, provided the appellant furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the (Downloaded on 04/12/2021 at 09:24:35 PM) (3 of 3) satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance in this Court on 03rd January, 2022 and as and when called upon to do so.

(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J Hemant/55 (Downloaded on 04/12/2021 at 09:24:35 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)