Lokesh Kumar Son Of Sukhdev vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3537 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Lokesh Kumar Son Of Sukhdev vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 August, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR
     S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application
                                 No.88/2020
                                         IN

               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 107/2020

Lokesh Kumar Son Of Sukhdev, Resident Of Village Bhainsa
Pichuna,    Tehsil   Roopbas,          Police     Station          Uchchain,   District
Bharatpur, At Present Mahesh Koli Ka Makaan, Ganesh Colony,
Sanganer, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In
Central Jail Jaipur)
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                      Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
                                                                      ----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kirodee Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI Judgment / Order 10/08/2021

1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

2. It is contended by counsel for the appellant that the deceased committed suicide and the reason assigned for the same is that the appellant was in a habit of consuming alcohol. It is also contended that there is no evidence with regard to demand of dowry soon before the death of the deceased. From the evidence of the neighbours, it is evident that there was no dispute between the couple. Except the ligature mark on the neck, there was no mark of injury on the person of the deceased. It is further contended that the appellant has remained in custody for a period (Downloaded on 13/08/2021 at 09:25:53 PM) (2 of 2) [SOSA-88/2020] of about three and a half years. Disposal of appeal will take time.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Considering the contentions of counsel for the appellant, application for suspension of sentence is allowed.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused- applicant in Sessions Case No.123/2017 shall remain suspended if the appellant furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that he shall appear before this Court as and when called upon to do so.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J ARTI SHARMA /8 (Downloaded on 13/08/2021 at 09:25:53 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)