HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 277/2020
1. Rewant Ram S/o Kishna Ram, Aged About 56 Years, Post Kajnau Kala, Tehsil Bawdi, District Jodhpur.
2. Kan Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 57 Years, Dhundadia, Tehsil Osiyan, District Jodhpur.
3. Arjun Singh S/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About 46 Years, Bhed, Tehsil Osiyan, District Jodhpur.
4. Bhagirath S/o Chhoga Ram, Aged About 46 Years, Mandla Kala, Tehsil Dechu, District Jodhpur.
5. Raghuveer Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 44 Years, Pilwa, Tehsil Dechu, District Jodhpur.
6. Ram Khiladi S/o Nehnu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Rehadia, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa
7. Ganesh Ram S/o Ganga Sahai, Aged About 41 Years, Dhigaria, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa.
8. Kailash Meena S/o Jai Singh Meena, Aged About 41 Years, Baneti, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur.
9. Megha Ram S/o Jasu Ram, Aged About 50 Years, Jatipura, Tehsil Osiyan, District Jodhpur.
10. Parbat Singh S/o Sang Singh, Aged About 54 Years, Gram Matoda, Tehsil Bapini, District Jodhpur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range, Jodhpur.
4. The District Police Superintendent, Jodhpur Rural.
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Suthar for Mr. Manoj Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kailash Choudhary for Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG (Downloaded on 24/08/2021 at 08:48:40 PM) (2 of 2) [CW-277/2020] JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 24/08/2021 Mr. Kailash Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that this Court has allowed the writ petition being SB Civil Writ Petition No.18677/2019 (Kishna Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors), vide order dated 10.02.2021, while observing thus :
"Consequently, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is allowed. The respondents are directed to delete the questions which are out of syllabus and proportionately distribute the marks of deleted questions in the rest of questions of respective papers and then re-evaluate the marks obtained by the candidates and declare the result and if the petitioners obtain the requisite qualifying marks, they be subjected to further process of parade, outdoor test and interview and thereafter redetermine the list of candidates, entitled to participate in the Promotion Cadre Course. Those candidates, who have obtained eligibility vide result dated 11.12.2019, have undergone the parade, outdoor test and interview and continue to remain eligible after re-evaluation as directed hereinbefore, need not be subjected to parade, outdoor test and interview all over again.
Needful may be done by the respondents with utmost expedition.
No order as to costs."
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 10.02.2021 passed in Kishna Ram (supra).
The directions given in the aforesaid judgment shall also apply in the present case also.
Stay application also stands disposed of.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 245-A.Arora/-
(Downloaded on 24/08/2021 at 08:48:40 PM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)