Priyanka Solanki vs The State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9012 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Priyanka Solanki vs The State Of Rajasthan on 7 April, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6081/2021 Priyanka Solanki D/o Durga Singh Solanki, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 2F, Puri Enclave, New Akashwani Colony, Kota.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).

3. Joint Director, Secondary Education, Bharatpur Division, Bharatpur.

4. Joint Director, Secondary Education, Kota Division, Kota.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla
For Respondent(s)          :



                       JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                  Judgment

07/04/2021


1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider petitioner's representation to be posted at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is lying vacant.

2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant. (Downloaded on 07/04/2021 at 09:03:53 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-6081/2021]

3. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt thereof.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 198-CPGoyal/-

(Downloaded on 07/04/2021 at 09:03:53 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)