Dr. Vikash Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8703 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dr. Vikash Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 April, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5640/2021 Dr. Vikash Choudhary S/o Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 33 Years, By Caste Choudhary, R/o B-1St Ganga Sagar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. At Present 109 Roop Nagar-Iind, Pal Road, Jodhpur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan Secretary, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Directorate Of Animal Husbandry Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Jaipur.

4. Additional Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Jodhpur.

                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :    Mr. Dalpat Singh
For Respondent(s)         :



                      JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                    Order

01/04/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already furnished representation dated 10.04.2019 with request to give him joining in light of the judgments of this Court, yet nothing has been done.

2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with photo-stat copy of the relevant judgments and other documents before the respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks from today.

(Downloaded on 01/04/2021 at 09:02:08 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-5640/2021]

3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law; however, in no case later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 200-CPGoyal/-

(Downloaded on 01/04/2021 at 09:02:08 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)