Yarra Srinu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5120 AP
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2022

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Yarra Srinu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 August, 2022
Bench: Ravi Cheemalapati
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

     CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.5952, 5959 & 5963 OF 2022

COMMON ORDER:

       These Criminal Petitions are filed under Sections 437 & 439

of Criminal Procedure Code ('Cr.P.C.' in short), seeking regular

bail, by the petitioners/Accused in the following crimes:

       Crime No.138 of 2022 dated 24.05.2022 of Amalapuram

Town    Police   Station,   Amalapuram,   East   Godavari   District,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 143,

144, 147, 148, 151, 152, 332, 336, 427, 188, 353 r/w. 149 of

IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property

Act, 1984 and Section 32 of Police Act, 1861.

       Crime No.140 of 2022 dated 24.05.2022 of Amalapuram

Town    Police   Station,   Amalapuram,   East   Godavari   District,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 143,

144, 147, 148, 151, 336, 435, 188 r/w. 149 of IPC, Sections 3

and 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and

Section 32 of Police Act, 1861.

       Crime No.141 of 2022 dated 24.05.2022 of Amalapuram

Town    Police   Station,   Amalapuram,   East   Godavari   District,

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 143,

144, 147, 148, 452, 436, 435, 188 r/w. 149 of IPC and Section

32 of Police Act, 1861.

2.     Since all the petitioners/Accused are one and the same

and all the above crimes were registered in relation to

Konaseema agitation, they are being disposed of by this

common order.
                                 2

3.    The facts of the case, in brief, are that on 24.05.2022 on a

call given by JAC of Konaseema Sadhana Committee, huge

number of people gathered for submitting objections pursuant to

issuance of Gazette notification with regard to change of name of

Konaseema District, by violating the order under Section 144 of

Cr.P.C. and Section 30 of the Police Act. The mob started rally

at Kalasam Centre, Amalapuram Town and proceeded to Clock

Tower Centre and in the meanwhile various groups of public

came from four corners to the clock tower centre and formed

into a huge mob.

      Thereafter the mob moved to Collectorate and on the way

to Collectorate, when Police were discharging their duties, the

mob pelted stones on the Police and also burnt BVC college bus

which was used as transport vehicle for Police.

      Further, when the Police tried to control the mob at

Collectorate, the mob pelted stones on Police personnel due to

which some of the Police sustained injuries, damaged the glasses

of Collectorate Office and Ambedkar Bhavan.

      Thereafter, the mob proceeded to Red Bridge (Erra

Vanthenna), intercepted two RTC buses, damaged them and set

fire to the buses.

      The mob further moved towards the house of Hon'ble

Minister.   When the mob shouted and beat police persons, AR

constable fired rounds in air, but agitators attacked complainant

and his staff; attacked staff of the Hon'ble Minister, caused

damage to the furniture and set fire to the house of the Minister

and later proceeded to the house of local MLA.     Basing on the
                                 3

complaint lodged by the Home guard Crime No.138 of 2022 was

registered, basing on the complaint lodged by Driver, APSRTC,

Crime No.140 of 2022 was registered, basing on the complaint

lodged by the brother of Mummadivaram MLA Crime No.141 of

2022 was registered.


4.   Heard    M/s.   J.V.Phaniduth,   learned   Counsel     for   the

petitioners and Sri Soora Venkata Sainath, learned Special

Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners, in elaboration what has been raised in the grounds, contended that initially the petitioners' names were not figured in the complaint. Basing on the confession statements of the other accused, their names were arrayed as accused in the above crimes. It is also contended that some of the accused in the present crimes and other crimes registered in connection with the same incident were granted regular as well as anticipatory bails. It is also contended that the petitioners were arrested on different dates from 28.05.2022 to 19.06.2022 and since then they are languishing in jail and requested to consider enlarging the petitioners on bail on any conditions that may be imposed.

6. On the other hand, the learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have already approached Sessions Court and filed bail application wherein the trial court dismissed their bail applications and the same were placed on record. Further submitted that the involvement of the petitioners is evident from the photographs taken at the scene of 4 offence and investigation is still pending. If at all this Court wants to consider the present bail petitions, in such case, he draw the attention of the Court to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kodungallu Film Society v. Union of India1 wherein it is held as follows:

C. Liability of person causing violence
a) .......
          b)      .......

          c)      A person arrested for either committing or
initiating, promoting, instigating or in any way causing to occur any act of violence which results in loss of life or damage to property may be granted conditional bail upon depositing the quantified loss caused due to such violence or furnishing security for such quantified loss. ....."

Relying on the judgment cited supra, the learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor, prayed this Court to impose some costs for the loss caused to the State.

7. A perusal of the complaint discloses that initially the petitioners' names were not reflected, but as per the confession statements of the other accused, the petitioners' names are reflected in the above crimes.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners herein are falsely implicated in these crimes due to political differences whereas according to the prosecution, petitioners are active participants in the rally and they executed illegal acts as per conspiracy of their leaders. 1 (2018) 10 SCC 713 : 2018 SCC Online SC 1719 5 The learned Public Prosecutor specifically urged that petitioners' custody is important in this case, since according to the prosecution, they are active participants in hatching up the plan through whatsapp group and other social media platform, which resulted in occurrence of large-scale violence and other related executing the illegal acts as conspired.

Further, admittedly the mob consists of more than 1000 people. None of the complaints indicate about common intention or common object of committing an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. Specific overt acts were not attributed against the petitioners.

It is also evident from the record that the mob gathered for submitting their representations at Collectorate office, but not with an intention of committing any offence and admittedly the mob was not armed with weapons. Photographs filed by prosecution do not show that mob is armed with weapons.

Till today, there is no material to show that the petitioners have damaged any property. In view of the same, the decision relied on by the learned Special Assistant Public Prosecutor cannot be made applicable at this stage and his request to impose costs cannot be considered.

On perusal of the material on record, considering the submissions of the both the parties and in view of the fact that the other accused were already granted regular/anticipatory bail by this Court whereas the petitioners are languishing in jail, this Court feels it appropriate to consider granting bail to the petitioners on the following conditions:

6

(i) The petitioners shall be released on bail on their executing self bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Amalapuram for each crime;

(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer, Amalapuram Town Police Station twice in a week i.e. on every Monday and Thursday between 9.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon, till filing of the charge sheet;

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly contact the complainant or any other witnesses under any circumstances and any such attempt shall be construed as an attempt of influencing the witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence and shall co-operate with the investigation.

Further, the petitioners shall scrupulously comply with the above conditions and breach of any of the above conditions will be viewed seriously and bail automatically gets cancelled without any further order of this Court.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11th August, 2022 AG 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CRIMINAL PETITION NOs.5952, 5959 & 5963 OF 2022 Date : 11.08.2022 AG